A Comparative Analysis of Local Governance Structures in Ethnically Diverse Countries: A Case Study of India and Switzerland

Authors

    Mehran Ghojezadeh Faculty Member, Department of Law, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Iran

Keywords:

Local governance, federalism, ethnic diversity, direct democracy, cantonal autonomy

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of local governance structures in India and Switzerland, both of which face extensive ethnic and linguistic diversity. As the world's largest democracy, India utilizes its federal system, characterized by state and local divisions, to manage this diversity. Through mechanisms such as reservation systems and local institutions like the Panchayati Raj, India has ensured broad participation of various ethnic and linguistic groups in the governance process. In contrast, Switzerland relies on its unique model of cantonal federalism and direct democracy to manage its linguistic and ethnic diversity. Swiss cantons, with their significant autonomy, effectively respond to local and ethnic needs. The comparative analysis reveals that both countries have achieved success in managing ethnic and linguistic diversity, albeit through different approaches. This article examines the cultural, historical, and social impacts on local governance in both countries, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each system and offering recommendations for improving local governance in multi-ethnic societies.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-15

Submitted

2020-04-21

Revised

2020-06-30

Accepted

2020-07-23

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

A Comparative Analysis of Local Governance Structures in Ethnically Diverse Countries: A Case Study of India and Switzerland. (2024). Comparative Studies in Jurisprudence, Law, and Politics, 2(1), 14-23. http://193.36.85.187:8088/index.php/csjlp/article/view/30

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.